Uniloc Luxembourg S.a., and Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Eclinical Works, LLC, and Pulse Systems, Inc.

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A., AND
UNILOC USA, INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ECLINICAL WORKS, LLC, AND
PULSE SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
______________________
2014-1005
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Central District of California in Nos. 2:13-cv-03244-MWF-
PLA and 2:13-cv-03246-MWF-PLA, Judge Michael W.
Fitzgerald.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
L AWRENCE M. HADLEY , McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C.,
of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiffs-
appellants. With him on the brief was ALAN P. BLOCK;
and D ANIEL L. G EYSER , of Dallas, Texas. Of counsel on
the brief was J AMES L. ETHERIDGE, Etheridge Law Group,
of Southlake, Texas.

-- 1 of 2 --

K EITH M. AURZADA, Bryan Cave LLP, of Dallas, Tex-
as, argued for defendant-appellee, eClinical Works, LLC.
With him on the brief was J OHN C. BUSH , of Atlanta,
Georgia. Of counsel on the brief was RYAN T. P UMPIAN,
Bloom Sugarman Everett, LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia.
D ON V. K ELLY , Evans & Dixon, LLC, of Saint Louis,
Missouri, argued for defendant-appellee, Pulse Systems,
Inc.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (MOORE, CLEVENGER , and REYNA, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
October 14, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --