Anne Stauffer v. Kelly Miller

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
ANNE STAUFFER,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
KELLY MILLER,
Defendant-Appellant.
______________________
2014-1674
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Columbia in No. 1:14-mc-00454-ABJ-AK, Judge
Amy Berman Jackson.
______________________
P ER CURIAM .
O R D E R
The parties were directed to show cause why this ap-
peal should not be transferred to the United States Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The
Library of Congress responded and argued that the ap-
peal should be transferred. Kelly Miller responded that
the Superior Court of the District of Columbia does not
have jurisdiction over this appeal.
Miller does not respond concerning the jurisdiction of
the United States Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit, which is the jurisdictional issue before
Case: 14-1674 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 10/21/2014

-- 1 of 2 --

STAUFFER v. MILLER 2
this court. This court is a court of limited jurisdiction,
which does not include jurisdiction over the appeal of a
subpoena matter removed to federal court.
28 U.S.C. § 1295.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1631, this court is authorized to
transfer a case to a court in which the appeal could have
been brought at the time it was filed or noticed, here, the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Colum-
bia Circuit.
Accordingly,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
The appeal and all pending motions are transferred to
the United States Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1631.
F OR THE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
s25
Case: 14-1674 Document: 16 Page: 2 Filed: 10/21/2014

-- 2 of 2 --