Dana M. Porter v. Dept. of the Treasury Michael Buesgens

PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
____________
Nos. 07-3859, 08-4663, 09-1162
_____________
DANA M. PORTER
v.
DEPT. OF THE TREASURY
*MICHAEL BUESGENS
Appellant in No. 07-3859
*(Pursuant to Rule 12(a), F.R.A.P.)
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Civil Action No. 07-cv-01541)
District Judge: Honorable Bruce W. Kauffman
TOMMIE H. TELFAIR,
Appellant in No. 08-4663
v.
KAREN P. TANDY, Administrator-Drug Enforcement Administration; GERARD P.
MCALEER, Director/Senior Officer-DEA: Newark; 1-50 UNKNOWN DEA AGENTS;
1-50 UNKNOWN FEDERAL AGENTS; RAY MCCARTHY, Chief of Police, Newark;
MURAD MUHAMMED, Roberty-Homicide, OIC Newark Police; 1-50 UNKNOWN
POLICE OFFICERS; PAUL W. BERGRIN, Private Attorney-District of New Jersey;
CHRISTOPHER CHRISTY, AUSA-District of New Jersey
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey
(D.C. Civil Action No. 08-cv-0731)

-- 1 of 3 --

District Judge: Honorable William J. Martini
JEWEL POWELL; WINSTON POWELL a/k/a TOMMY POWELL, et. al.
v.
VIOLET O. MAHABIR; LORING W. SEWER; MARILYN E. WOODLEY; IRVIN A.
SEWER; EARL A. SEWER; WARREN A. SEWER; LUCINDA C. ANTHONY;
JUDITH O. CALLWOOD; LORREL A. SEWER,
Appellants in No. 09-1162
____________________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of the Virgin Islands
(D.C. Civil Action No. 05-cv-00083)
District Judge: Honorable Raymond J. Finch
Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27 and I.O.P. 10
Before: McKEE, RENDELL and SMITH, Circuit Judges
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
It appearing that at times the text of the opinion and order filed on April 16, 2009,
identified the appellant in appeal No. 07-3859 as Dana M. Porter rather than Michael
Buesgens, it is hereby O R D E R E D that the opinion and order shall be amended. The
following changes shall be made to the text of the opinion:
Page 8, paragraph 2, first sentence is amended as follows:
Buesgens, who proceeds pro se, and the Mahabir appellants, who are represented
by counsel, have moved to voluntarily dismiss their appeals under Federal Rule of
Appellate Procedure 42(b).
Page 8, paragraph 2, last sentence is amended as follows:

-- 2 of 3 --

Accordingly, while we will grant Mahabir’s and Buesgens’s motions to withdraw
their appeals ...
Page 9, paragraph 2, first sentence is amended as follows:
Buesgens’s and the Mahabir appellants’ motions to withdraw their appeals under
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) are granted.
For the Court,
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Dated: April 17, 2009

-- 3 of 3 --