Testo completo
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_______________
No. 22-1847
_______________
JAMES STEUERT,
Appellant
v.
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
_______________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey
(D.C. No. 1:11-cv-03385)
District Judge: Honorable Joseph H. Rodriguez
_______________
Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)
on January 26, 2023
Before: BIBAS, NYGAARD, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges
(Filed: January 26, 2023)
_______________
OPINION*
_______________
BIBAS, Circuit Judge.
James Steuert appeals the dismissal of his complaint. But because the District Court
never issued a final judgment, we lack jurisdiction to review that dismissal. 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. The District Court gave Steuert twenty days to file an amended complaint but did
* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and, under I.O.P. 5.7, is not binding
precedent.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
not “provide[ ] express notice” that its order would “automatically produce a final order of
dismissal when the time to amend [ran] out.” Weber v. McGrogan, 939 F.3d 232, 240 (3d
Cir. 2019). And though Steuert filed a notice of appeal after those twenty days, he did not
clearly stand on his complaint. See id. So we will dismiss his appeal.
-- 2 of 2 --
