William F. Kaetz v. United States of America

NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 23-2114
___________
WILLIAM F. KAETZ,
Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; RENÉE MARIE BUMB,
Chief United States District Judge New Jersey District Court, Trenton Vicinage
____________________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey
(D.C. Civil Action No. 1-23-cv-02741)
District Judge: Honorable Juan R. Sánchez
____________________________________
Submitted on Appellees’ Motion for Summary Affirmance
Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6
September 12, 2024
Before: JORDAN, PORTER, and PHIPPS, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: October 1, 2024)
_________
OPINION*
_________
* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not
constitute binding precedent.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM
Appellees’ motion for summary affirmance is granted, and we will summarily
affirm the District Court’s order dismissing William Kaetz’s complaint. The reasons for
our ruling are explained by separate opinion issued in Kaetz v. United States, C.A. No.
23-2322. Kaetz’s motion to withdraw the motion for judicial notice that he filed at
Appeal Docket No. 18 is granted. Kaetz’s corrected motion for judicial notice is granted
to the extent that we have considered the arguments raised therein in resolving this
appeal. To the extent that any of Kaetz’s submissions on appeal can be construed to
request any other relief, such relief is denied.

-- 2 of 2 --