Richard J. Silverberg v. Dupont De Nemours Inc

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
____________
No. 24-1774
____________
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG,
Appellant
v.
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC; DOW INC; CORTEVA INC; INTERNATIONAL
FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES; AVANTOR INC; LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP INC;
VANGUARD GROUP INC; WILLIAM PENN FOUNDATION; CITY OF
PHILADELPHIA; BALLARD SPAHR LLP; GELLERT SCALI BUSENKELL &
BROWN LLC; EDWARD BREEN; ANDREW LIVERIS; RAJIV GUPTA;
ANDREAS FIBIG; DAVID H. LONG; TIMOTHY BUCKLEY; JANET HAAS, MD;
JAMES KENNEY; MARCEL S. PRATT, ESQUIRE; DIANA CORTES; MARISSA
O’CONNELL, ESQUIRE; BRIAN R. CULLIN, ESQUIRE; GARY F. SEITZ,
ESQUIRE; JOHN DOE NOS. 1-15
____________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. No. 2:23-cv-01868)
District Judge: Honorable R. Barclay Surrick
____________
No. 24-1775
____________
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG,
Appellant
v.
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC; DOW INC; CORTEVA INC; INTERNATIONAL
FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES; AVANTOR INC; LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP INC;
VANGUARD GROUP INC; WILLIAM PENN FOUNDATION; CITY OF
PHILADELPHIA; BALLARD SPAHR LLP; GELLERT SCALI BUSENKELL &

-- 1 of 3 --

BROWN LLC; OFFICE DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL EDWARD BREEN; ANDREW
LIVERIS; RAJIV GUPTA; ANDREAS FIBIG; DAVID H. LONG; TIMOTHY
BUCKLEY; JANET HAAS, MD; JAMES KENNEY; MARCEL S. PRATT,
ESQUIRE; DIANA CORTES; MARISSA O’CONNELL, ESQUIRE; BRIAN R.
CULLIN, ESQUIRE; GARY F. SEITZ, ESQUIRE; THOMAS J. FARRELL, ESQ.,
ESQUIRE; RICHARD HERNANDEZ, ESQUIRE; JOSHUA ROBERTS; DANIEL
ANDERS; JOHN DOE NOS. 1-5
____________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. No. 2:24-cv-00924)
District Judge: Honorable R. Barclay Surrick
____________
Before: MATEY, FREEMAN, and ROTH, Circuit Judges
_______________
JUDGMENT ORDER
_______________
Having considered the parties’ arguments about whether these appeals have been
rendered moot, it is hereby ORDERED that these appeals are DISMISSED as moot.1
Costs shall not be taxed.
By the Court,
s/Arianna J. Freeman
Circuit Judge
1 Appellant’s Amended Motions for Summary Action, Sanctions, and Attorney Discipline
are denied. All other motions in these appeals are denied as moot.

-- 2 of 3 --

ATTEST:
s/ Patricia S. Dodszuweit
Clerk
Dated: May 20, 2025
cc: All Counsel of Record

-- 3 of 3 --