Donald Andrews v. Wolcott Rivers Gates

14-1763Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12 dic 2014

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1763
DONALD ANDREWS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WOLCOTT RIVERS GATES; W. BRANTLEY BASNIGHT; DAVID M.
BASTIAANS; RICHARD E. BIEMILLER; STEVEN L. BROWN; ADAM M.
CARROLL; BARRY DORANS; CARL A. EASON; CHESHIRE I’ANSON
EVELEIGH; JOHN F. FABER; RONALD M. GATES; AMEET I. HABIB;
DOUGLAS E. KAHLE; KYLE D. KORTE; STEPHAN J. LIPSKIS;
SAMUEL W. MEEKINS; MARK V. PASCUCCI; M. POWELL PETERS;
STEPHEN P. PFEIFFER; ANTHONY F. RADD; DAVID N. REDA;
CARTWRIGHT R. REILLY; WILSON L. RIVERS; GLEN M. ROBERTSON;
C. ARTHUR ROBINSON; JOHN F. SAWYER; CULLEN D. SPECKHART;
LESLIE R. WATSON; MARSHALL A. WINSLOW; EDWARD W. WOLCOTT;
BRANDON H. ZEIGLER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:14-cv-00076-HEH)
Submitted: December 9, 2014 Decided: December 12, 2014
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Donald Andrews, Appellant Pro Se. Brendan David O’Toole,
WILLIAMS MULLEN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Donald W. Andrews, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing this action alleging malicious prosecution,
extortion, RICO violations and mail fraud. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Andrews v. Wolcott
Rivers Gates, No. 3:14-cv-00076-HEH (E.D. Va. July 3, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.