Eddie Wise; Dorothy Monroe-Wise v. United States Department of Agriculture

14-1947Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit3 feb 2015

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1947
EDDIE WISE; DOROTHY MONROE-WISE,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; JAMES DAVENPORT,
Individually; MIKE HUSKEY, Individually; AARON A. MARTIN,
Individually; JUAN M. GARCIA, Individually; TOM VILSACK, In
his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States
Department of Agriculture; PAULA F. NICHOLLS, Individually;
DEBBIE HOUSTON, Individually; CYNTHIA I. KERNODLE,
Individually; JOE LEONARD, In his official capacity as
Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights of United States
Department of Agriculture,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (4:13-cv-00234-BO)
Submitted: January 16, 2015 Decided: February 3, 2015
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Wise, Dorothy Monroe-Wise, Appellants Pro Se. Neal
Fowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas Gray Walker,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Appellants Eddie Wise and Dorothy Monroe-Wise appeal
the district court’s orders denying their motion for an
evidentiary hearing and granting the Defendants’ motion to
dismiss their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Wise v. U.S. Dep’t of
Agric., No. 4:13-cv-00234-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 2014; Aug. 19,
2014). We grant Appellants leave to proceed in forma pauperis
but deny their other pending motions. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.