Testo completo
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6103
NATHANIEL SINGLETON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FOOD SERVICE OFFICER MR. NELSON; FOOD SERVICE MR. TAYLOR;
FOOD SERVICE MR. CRAZE; FOOD SERVICE MS. JOHNSON; FOOD
SERVICE MS. VENTON; ADMINISTRATIVE FOOD SERVICE BROWN;
ADMINISTRATIVE FOOD SERVICE ARGLINE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-02985-RBH-SVH)
Submitted: April 17, 2014 Decided: April 22, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Singleton seeks to appeal the district
court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to
dismiss some, but not all, of Singleton’s claims asserted under
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). This court may exercise jurisdiction only
over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Singleton seeks to
appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --