UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1929
VERONICA W. OGUNSULA,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his individual
capacity as U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice
(DOJ); JAMES B. COMEY, in his individual capacity as
Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, DC;
THOMAS E. PEREZ, individually and as former Assistant
Attorney General, Civil Rights Division, DOJ; H. MARSHALL
JARRETT, individual and as former Director, U.S. Attorney’s
Office, (DOJ); MICHAEL E. HOROWITZ, individually and in his
capacity as the Inspector General (DOJ); JOSEPH S.
CAMPBELL, in his individual capacity as Deputy Assistant
Director, Criminal Investigative Division, FBI; SANDRA A.
BUNGO, in her individual capacity as Unit Chief, Initial
Processing Unit, Internal Investigations Section,
Inspective Division, FBI; MR. ROD ROSENSTEIN, individually,
U.S. Attorney for Maryland; BRYAN E. FOREMAN, individually
and his official capacity as the former Assistant U.S.
Attorney; THOMAS COYLE, individually and in his official
capacity as an Agent, FBI,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge.
(8:15-cv-01297-GJH)
Submitted: March 17, 2016 Decided: March 21, 2016
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Veronica W. Ogunsula, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Veronica W. Ogunsula appeals the district court’s order
denying her emergency motion for an order to vacate and rescind
eviction and dismissing her civil complaint in part without
prejudice and in part with prejudice. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Ogunsula v. Holder,
No. 8:15-cv-01297-GJH (D. Md. filed June 22 & entered June 23,
2015). We deny Ogunsula’s motions for a temporary restraining
order, stay pending appeal, emergency relief, and to expedite
the decision, and all other pending motions, with the exception
of Ogunsula’s motion to seal her motion to expedite. We grant
the motion to seal. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --