George Frederick Delaney v. BRANDON MULLEN, Sheriff Deputy, sued individually

17-7178Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28 nov 2017

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7178
GEORGE FREDERICK DELANEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRANDON MULLEN, Sheriff Deputy, sued individually and in his official
capacity; JACOB T. MCNAMARA, Sheriff Deputy, sued individually and in his
official capacity; KENNETH STOLLE, Sheriff, sued individually and in his
official capacity; YOLANDA VINES, R.N., sued individually and in her official
capacity; ELIZIBETH NICHOLSON, L.P.N., sued individually and in her official
capacity; M. BAPTISTE, Sheriff Deputy, sued individually and in his or her
official capacity; B. ORCHARD, Sheriff Deputy, sued individually and in his or
her official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00779-CMH-TCB)
Submitted: November 21, 2017 Decided: November 28, 2017
Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Frederick Delaney, Appellant Pro Se.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
George Frederick Delaney seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action against some, but not all, Defendants. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen
v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Delaney seeks
to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.