Palomo Farms LLC/hemport v. U.s. Drug Enforcement Administration

18-1766Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit5 apr 2019

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1766
PALOMO FARMS LLC/HEMPORT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION; U.S. CUSTOMS AND
BORDER PROTECTION; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; WILLIAM P.
BARR, Attorney General of the United States,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (4:17-cv-00169-BO)
Submitted: February 26, 2019 Decided: April 5, 2019
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elaine B. Wilson, LAW OFFICE OF ELAINE B. WILSON, P.L.L.C., Clayton, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Robert J. Higdon, Jr., United States Attorney, Joshua B.
Royster, Assistant United States Attorney, Michael Gordon James, Assistant United
States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Palomo Farms LLC/Hemport appeals the district court’s order dismissing its
complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Palomo Farms LLC/Hemport v. U.S. Drug Enf., No.
4:17-cv-00169-BO (E.D.N.C. June 8, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.