Gregory D. Ivy v. HECTOR JOYNER, Warden

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6315
GREGORY D. IVY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
HECTOR JOYNER, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:18-cv-02158-HMH)
Submitted: April 25, 2019 Decided: April 30, 2019
Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory D. Ivy, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory D. Ivy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. The district court referred this case to a
magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge
recommended denying relief and advised Ivy that failure to file timely, specific
objections to the recommendation would waive appellate review of a district court order
based on the recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is
necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the
parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Massey v. Ojaniit, 759
F.3d 343, 352 (4th Cir. 2014); see Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). Ivy has
waived appellate review by failing to file objections. Accordingly, we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --