Darrell J. Williams v. Bryan Stirling; Officer Wiggins; Warden Randall Williams

19-6322Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit5 ago 2019

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6322
DARRELL J. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRYAN STIRLING; OFFICER WIGGINS; WARDEN RANDALL WILLIAMS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (2:18-cv-01690-CMC-
MGB)
Submitted: July 17, 2019 Decided: August 5, 2019
Before KING, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrell J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Darrell J. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order affirming the
magistrate judge’s denial of Williams’ motions to subpoena expert witnesses and to
compel discovery. He also seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his
motions to compel discovery and inspection and his motion for relief from judgment.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders
Williams seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral
orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Williams’
motion to suspend proceedings and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.