David Wright, Sr. v. Pa Otto Hansen, individual capacity

20-6204Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19 nov 2020

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6204
DAVID WRIGHT, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PA OTTO HANSEN, individual capacity and official capacity; DR.
JULIA BERRIOS, individual capacity and official capacity; DR. JUDE ONUOHA,
individual capacity and official capacity; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; LUIS
NEGRON, MLP; DR. CHERIE SMITH; DR. DECOCO,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
M. TRAVIS BRAGG, FCI Bennetsville Warden, individual capacity and official
capacity; R. HARSANY, Kitchen Staff Supervisor, individual capacity and official
capacity; MR. BROWN, Safety Supervisor, individual capacity and official
capacity; S. K. BROSIER, Executive Assistant, individual capacity and official
capacity; DOES 1 THROUGH 20,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (8:17-cv-02805-DCC-JDA)
Submitted: November 17, 2020 Decided: November 19, 2020
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Wright, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
David Wright seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate
judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing Wright’s claims against the United
States. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen
v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Wright seeks to
appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.