Darrell L. Goss v. Bryan P. Stirling

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7835
DARRELL L. GOSS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRYAN P. STIRLING; CHARLES WILLIAMS; THOMAS ROBERTSON;
ALYSON GLADWELL; STEPHANIE MARSHALL; OFFICER STANLEY
TERRY; LIEUTENANT CLARISSA JONES; DEBORAH RICHTER; JENNIFER
FRANKLIN, Mailroom Director; SERGEANT WARREN PEEK; VERDEIA
HALL, Corporal; CHARLES CROSBY, Officer; CARLOS RIVERA, Officer;
JUANITA MOSS; WILLIE SMITH; CHAPLAIN NEDENIA PARKER-BARBER;
CANTEEN MANAGER GEORGIA YELDELL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (6:18-cv-03245-BHH)
Submitted: January 12, 2022 Decided: May 18, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and KING and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrell L. Goss, Appellant Pro Se. Robert David Garfield, CROWE LAFAVE LLC,
Columbia, South Carolina; Andrew Lindemann, LINDEMANN & DAVIS, P.A.,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Darrell L. Goss appeals from the district court’s order adopting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation and granting summary judgment to several Defendants on his
claims under the First and Eighth Amendments and dismissing with prejudice the
remaining Defendants and claims against them under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) in his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Goss v. Stirling,
No. 6:18-cv-03245-BHH (D.S.C. Dec. 2, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --