In re: Thomas Brock

21-1990Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit6 ott 2021

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1990
In re: THOMAS BROCK,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:05-cr-00116-D-2)
Submitted: September 28, 2021 Decided: October 6, 2021
Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Brock, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Brock petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has
unduly delayed acting on his motion for a sentence reduction under Section 404 of the First
Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194. He seeks an order from this court
directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the
district court has granted in part and denied in part Brock’s motion. Accordingly, because
the district court has recently decided Brock’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as
moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.