Bank of America, N.a. v. Mithun Banerjee

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2105
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MITHUN BANERJEE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:21-cv-01359-TDC)
Submitted: May 19, 2022 Decided: May 23, 2022
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mithun Banerjee, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Mithun Banerjee seeks to appeal the district court’s order remanding the underlying
civil action against Banerjee to the state court from which it was removed. “[T]he law as
it stands today provides that an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was
removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise, except that an order remanding a case
to the State court from which it was removed pursuant to [28 U.S.C. §] 1442 or [§] 1443...
shall be reviewable by appeal or otherwise.” BP P.L.C. v. Mayor & City Council of Balt.,
141 S. Ct. 1532, 1536-37 (2021) (cleaned up). The district court remanded the case to state
court after determining that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. We therefore are without
jurisdiction to review the remand order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --