Lindsey Palmer; Alistair Philbert v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company; Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

21-2128Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit15 lug 2022

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2128
LINDSEY PALMER; ALISTAIR PHILBERT,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
and
WILLIAM MINYARD; DALTON MINYARD,
Plaintiffs,
v.
NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY;
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Roderick Charles Young, District Judge. (2:19-cv-00403-RCY-LRL;
2:19-cv-00404-RCY-RJK)
Submitted: May 31, 2022 Decided: July 15, 2022
Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
ON BRIEF: William D. Breit, BREIT LAW, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
Appellants. Shawn A. Voyles, Paul R. Schmeding, MCKENRY DANCIGERS
DAWSON, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Lindsey Palmer and Alistair Philbert appeal from the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company on
their declaratory judgment action regarding liability for an automobile accident. We have
reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and we find that the
summary judgment was properly granted to Nationwide. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. See Palmer v. Nationwide Prop. and Cas. Ins. Co., Nos. 2:19-cv-
00403-RCY-LRL; 2:19-cv-00404-RCY-RJK (E.D. Va. Sept. 13, 2021). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.