Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr. v. Dva Martinsburg

21-2364Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit26 mag 2022

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2364
ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DVA MARTINSBURG; NAGE (SEIU); SUSAN ANDERSON; SARAH E.
SUSZCZYK; RICHARD MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs (DVA,
Martinsburg),
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:20-cv-00153-GMG-RWT)
Submitted: May 24, 2022 Decided: May 26, 2022
Before NIEMEYER, KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Keith Richard Bolek, Diana Rachel Cohn,
O’DONOGHUE & O’DONOGHUE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Arthur Lee Hairston appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Hairston v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, No.
3:20-cv-00153-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 12, 2021). We deny Hairston’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.