Alice Guan v. Gary Bell

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2397
ALICE GUAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GARY BELL; SERGEY KATSENELENBOGEN; JEN KIM; JAMES C. CLARK,
as an individual and in his capacity as the Judge for Alexandria Circuit Court the
18th Judicial Circuit of Virginia; DONALD W. LEMONS, as an individual, and as
the Chief Justice for the Supreme Court of Virginia; S. BERNARD GOODWYN, as
an individual, and as the Justice for the Supreme Court of Virginia; WILLIAM C.
MIMS, as an individual, and as the Justice for the Supreme Court of Virginia; CLEO
E. POWELL, as an individual, and as the Justice for the Supreme Court of Virginia;
STEPHEN R. MCCULLOUGH, as an individual, and as the Justice for the Supreme
Court of Virginia; CHARLES S. RUSSELL, as an individual, and as the Senior
Justice for the Supreme Court of Virginia; LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR., as an
individual, and as the Senior Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia; LEROY F.
MILLETTE, JR., as an individual, and as the Senior Justice for the Supreme Court
of Virginia; THE ALEXANDRIA CIRCUIT COURT, the 18th Judicial Circuit of
Virginia; THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00752-LO-TCB)
Submitted: May 24, 2022 Decided: May 26, 2022
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alice Guan, Appellant Pro Se. James Bennett Kinsel, PROTORAE LAW PLLC, Tysons,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Alice Guan appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to
dismiss Guan’s civil claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Guan v. Bell,
No. 1:21-cv-00752-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 30, 2021 & entered Dec. 1, 2021). We
grant Guan’s motion seeking to exceed the length limitations for her informal brief and
deny as moot the remaining pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --