United States of America v. D’angelo Dunlap

21-6155Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit9 nov 2021

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6155
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
D’ANGELO DUNLAP,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:01-cr-00097-PJM-1)
Submitted: November 4, 2021 Decided: November 9, 2021
Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
D’Angelo Dunlap, Appellant Pro Se. Gary Michael Morgan, Jr., Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
D’Angelo Dunlap appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step
Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239, and the order denying
his motion for reconsideration. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district
court did not abuse its discretion in denying Dunlap’s motions. See United States v. Kibble,
992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (per curiam) (stating standard), cert. denied, No. 21-
5624, 2021 WL 4733616 (U.S. Oct. 12, 2021). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.