United States of America v. Charles Eloys Johnson, a/k/a Adam White

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7148
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHARLES ELOYS JOHNSON, a/k/a Adam White,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:15-cr-00386-RMG-1)
Submitted: April 28, 2022 Decided: June 3, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Kimberly H. Albro, Assistant Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. M. Rhett
Dehart, Acting United States Attorney, Nathan S. Williams, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Eloys Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the
record on appeal and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
Johnson’s motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (providing
standard), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 2:15-cr-00386-RMG-1 (D.S.C.
July 19, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --