Warren Matthew Giddings v. Montgomery County, Maryland

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7476
WARREN MATTHEW GIDDINGS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND; CHARLES COUNTY PROBATION
OFFICER 1; CHARLES COUNTY PROBATION OFFICER 2; MONTGOMERY
COUNTY HEAD/LEAD PROSECUTOR; HANNAH GLEASON, Montgomery
County Deputy District Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:21-cv-01958-GLR)
Submitted: May 24, 2022 Decided: May 26, 2022
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Warren Matthew Giddings, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Warren Matthew Giddings appeals the district court’s order dismissing without
prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint.* We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Giddings v. Montgomery Cnty., No. 1:21-cv-01958-GLR (D. Md. Sept. 22, 2021). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* We conclude that the district court’s order dismissing the complaint without
prejudice is an appealable final order. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 615 (4th
Cir. 2020), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 1376 (2021).

-- 2 of 2 --