United States of America v. Jesse Brown Davis

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7500
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JESSE BROWN DAVIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 21-7501
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JESSE BROWN DAVIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:05-cr-00069-HEH-1; 3:18-cr-
00162-HEH-1)
Submitted: May 24, 2022 Decided: May 26, 2022

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jesse Brown Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Jin Ah Lee, Assistant United States Attorney,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Jesse Brown Davis appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for
compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step
Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. We review a district
court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v.
Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
United States v. Davis, No. 3:05-cr-00069-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 2021); United
States v. Davis, No. 3:18-cr-00162-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 2021). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --