United States of America v. Dion Levering Williams, a/k/a Tion Williams, a/k/a Scroll, a/k/a Squirrel

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-7702
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DION LEVERING WILLIAMS, a/k/a Tion Williams, a/k/a Scroll, a/k/a Squirrel,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cr-00047-HEH-RCY-4)
Submitted: February 28, 2022 Decided: March 10, 2022
Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dion Levering Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Dion Levering Williams appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion
for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First
Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. We review a
district court’s denial of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United
States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have
reviewed the record and discern no abuse of discretion. See United States v. High, 997
F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for denial of
compassionate release motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --