Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, Md, Mph v. RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, RCSD, as employer of Deputy Pierce/Pearce

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1067
MARIE THERESE ASSA’AD-FALTAS, MD, MPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, RCSD, as employer of
Deputy Pierce/Pearce; LEON LOTT, officially as Sheriff of Richland County (RC),
South Carolina (SC) for injunctive relief; FORMER RCSD DEPUTY
PIERCE/PEARCE, individually for damages; and all their subordinates and/or
agents who did and/or intend to injure Plaintiff,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (3:18-cv-00578-MGL)
Submitted: December 15, 2022 Decided: December 19, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se. Robert David Garfield, CROWE
LAFAVE GARFIELD & BAGLEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina; Andrew
Lindemann, LINDEMANN & DAVIS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s judgment entered in
Defendants’ favor in Assa’ad-Faltas’ action raising 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law claims,
and the court’s orders denying Assa’ad-Faltas’ postjudgment motions. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment and orders. See Assa’ad-Faltas v. Richland Cnty. Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. 3:18-cv-
00578-MGL (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2021; Jan. 13, 2022). We deny all pending motions. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --