Ronald Satish Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeals (bia)

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1269
RONALD SATISH EMRIT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS (BIA); CITIZENSHIP &
IMMIGRATION SERVICES (CIS); CUSTOMS AND BORDER PATROL (CBP);
STATE DEPARTMENT; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS),
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:22-cv-00117-JAG)
Submitted: June 28, 2022 Decided: June 30, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Satish Emrit appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice
his complaint against various federal agencies for lack of jurisdiction. We conclude that
the court properly determined that Emrit’s case was not ripe because he asserted claims
based on events that had not yet occurred. See South Carolina v. United States, 912 F.3d
720, 730 (4th Cir. 2019) (“[A] plaintiff’s claim is not ripe for judicial review if it rests upon
contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all.”
(internal quotation marks omitted)). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --