Fermin Aldabe v. Jonathan Cohen

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1448
FERMIN ALDABE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JONATHAN COHEN; JOSEPH J. SIMONS; REBECCA KELLY SLAUGHTER;
NOAH JOSHUA PHILLIPS; ROHIT CHOPRA; CHRISTINE S. WILSON;
BENJAMIN J. THEISMAN; AMANDA B. KOSTNER; KHOURYANNA
DIPRIMA; CREIGHTON MAGID; THE GOVERMENT OF BELIZE; THE
CENTRAL BANK OF BELIZE; JOY GRANT; ATLANTIC INTERNATIONAL
BANK, LTD; JULIAN MURILLO,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00803-PJM)
Submitted: August 23, 2022 Decided: August 25, 2022
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, HEYTENS, Circuit Judge, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fermin Aldabe, Appellant Pro Se. Creighton Magid, DORSEY & WHITNEY, LLP,
Washington, D.C.; John Augustine Bourgeois, Andrew Jay Graham, KRAMON &
GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Fermin Aldabe seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing some, but not
all, of the claims raised in his civil complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only
over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541,
545-46 (1949). The order Aldabe seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --