In re: Antonio Shropshire, a/k/a Brill, a/k/a B, a/k/a Tony

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1475
In re: ANTONIO SHROPSHIRE, a/k/a Brill, a/k/a B, a/k/a Tony,
Petitioner .
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:16-cr-00051-CCB-3)
Submitted: May 27, 2022 Decided: June 8, 2022
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Shropshire, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Shropshire petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court
has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order from this
court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals
that on May 9, 2022, the district court denied relief on Shropshire’s motion. United
States v. Shropshire, No. 1:16-cr-00051-CCB-3 (D. Md. May 9, 2022). Accordingly,
because the district court has rendered its decision on Shropshire’s § 2255 motion, we deny
his mandamus petition as moot. See Incumaa v. Ozmint, 507 F.3d 281, 286 (4th Cir. 2007).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --