Rosibel Martinez; A.d.c.c.m.; Y.s.c.m. v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1792
ROSIBEL MARTINEZ; A.D.C.C.M.; Y.S.C.M.,
Petitioners,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: January 27, 2023 Decided: February 16, 2023
Before WYNN and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: James D. Brousseau, BROUSSEAU & LEE, PLLC, Falls Church, Virginia,
for Petitioners. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Zoe J.
Heller, Senior Litigation Counsel, Karen L. Melnik, Senior Trial Attorney, Office of
Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Rosibel Martinez and her two daughters, natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition
for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing their appeal
from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying their applications for asylum, withholding
of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly
reviewed the record and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to
any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that
substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478,
481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --