Consuelo Maria Romero-Arevalo v. Merrick B. Garland

22-1966Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit11 mag 2023

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1966
CONSUELO MARIA ROMERO-AREVALO,
Petitioner,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND,
Respondent.
On Appeal from an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted: March 14, 2023 Decided: May 11, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Jose Rafael Campos, LAW OFFICES OF CAMPOS & ASSOCIATES,
Wheaton, Maryland, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant
Attorney General, Anthony C. Payne, Assistant Director, Abigail E. Leach, Office of
Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Consuelo Maria Romero-Arevalo, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal
from the Immigration Judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of
removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have
thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling
contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and
that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S.
478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by
the Board. In re Romero-Arevalo (B.I.A. Aug. 18, 2022). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.