Robert Horowitz; Cathy Horowitz; Elizabeth Horowitz v. MR. ROSALES, Deputy Sheriff of Montgomery County

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-2301
ROBERT HOROWITZ; CATHY HOROWITZ; ELIZABETH HOROWITZ,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
MR. ROSALES, Deputy Sheriff of Montgomery County; YORGOS BALARAS,
Deputy Sheriff of Montgomery County; K. BROWN, Deputy Sheriff of
Montgomery County; MAURY S. EPNER; PATRICK J. KEARNEY; ROBIN
LEWIS, Deputy Sheriff of Montgomery County; PETERSON PICHARDO, Deputy
Sheriff of Montgomery County; OMAR RIVERA, Deputy Sheriff of Montgomery
County; MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; SELZER GURVITCH
RABIN WERTHEIMER & POLOTT, P.C.; BRUCE SHERMAN, Deputy Sheriff of
Montgomery County,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:19-cv-02459-DKC)
Submitted: April 23, 2024 Decided: May 16, 2024
Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Horowitz; Cathy Horowitz; Elizabeth Horowitz, Appellants Pro Se. Kirstin
Michele Lustila, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

-- 1 of 3 --

2
OF MARYLAND, Annapolis, Maryland; Bradford Scott Bernstein, MILES &
STOCKBRIDGE PC, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss
Plaintiffs’ civil complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). See Horowitz v. Rosales, No.
8:19-cv-02459-DKC (D. Md. May 11, 2020).* We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* On appeal, Plaintiffs do not specifically challenge any of the district court’s
decisions entered after the May 11, 2020, order. We therefore deem any issues relating to
those decisions waived. 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir.
2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our
review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”).

-- 3 of 3 --