Hazel Stoudemire, Jr. v. SERGEANT THOMAS, Prison Guard; LIEUTENANT PRIESTER; CAPTAIN LIVINGSTON

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6280
HAZEL STOUDEMIRE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT THOMAS, Prison Guard; LIEUTENANT PRIESTER; CAPTAIN
LIVINGSTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:21-cv-01230-JFA)
Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 28, 2022
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hazel Stoudemire, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, DAVIDSON,
WREN & DEMASTERS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Hazel Stoudemire, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Stoudemire’s
42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and declining to
exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claims. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Stoudemire v. Thomas, No. 2:21-cv-
01230-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 1, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --