Steve Audette v. United States of America

22-6471Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit18 ott 2022

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6471
STEVE AUDETTE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DR. NOGO; DR. BYRON HERBAL; DR.
ADEIRDRE STRIBLAND-RILEY; P.A. LAVON OVERTON; NURSE LISA
PATTERSON; NURSE CAROLYN CONNOLLY; NURSE ELIZABETH
LOZIUK; NURSE KIMBERLY REID; DR. GURINDER SANDHU; DR. REED;
NURSE NATASHA ASHE; NURSE JUSTINE NIXON; T. NOBLES; NURSE P.
NWABINWE; DR. EMAD WARD; ROGER HILL; CO JOHNSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:21-ct-03245-M)
Submitted: October 13, 2022 Decided: October 18, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steve Audette, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Steve Audette appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed
pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. Audette v. United States, No. 5:21-ct-03245-M (E.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2022). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.