Testo completo
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1655
GARY PISNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT MCCARTHY; KEVIN D. MCCARTHY; DANA M. EVANS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
George Jarrod Hazel and Stephanie A. Gallagher, District Judges. (8:22-cv-00019-SAG)
Submitted: April 11, 2024 Decided: April 15, 2024
Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Pisner, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Russell Hodges, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC,
Hanover, Maryland; Kenneth G. Stallard, CARR MALONEY, PC, Washington, D.C., for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gary Pisner appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint and denying
reconsideration. We grant Pisner’s motion to exceed the word limit for his reply brief.
Even so, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s orders. Pisner v. McCarthy, No. 8:22-cv-00019-SAG (D. Md. Sept. 26,
2022; Mar. 27, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
