Donald Rouse v. Dana Nessel, in her official

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1738
DONALD ROUSE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DANA NESSEL, in her official and individual and personal capacity as the Attorney
General for the State of Michigan; R. PAUL VIAR, in his official and individual and
personal capacity as the Assistant Attorney General for the State of Michigan;
DENNIS JAMES, in his official and individual and personal capacity as the Special
Agent for the Attorney General’s Office,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (8:22-cv-03800-DCC)
Submitted: April 17, 2024 Decided: June 5, 2024
Before GREGORY, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Rouse, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Rouse appeals the district court’s order and judgment agreeing in part with
the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing Rouse’s civil rights
complaint against Michigan state officials. We have carefully reviewed the record and see
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of Rouse’s
complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --