Testo completo
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6588
DARREL R. FISHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOE BIDEN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:23-ct-03097-BO-RJ)
Submitted: April 22, 2024 Decided: May 16, 2024
Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrel R. Fisher, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darrel R. Fisher appeals the district court’s order dismissing for failure to comply
with a court order his action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).∗ We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Fisher v. Biden,
No. 5:23-ct-03097-BO-RJ (E.D.N.C. May 3, 2023). We deny Fisher’s request for
mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ The district court’s dismissal without prejudice is a final order because the court
dismissed the action “without granting leave to amend.” Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 791
(4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (order).
-- 2 of 2 --
