Pacita D. Whatley; Reverend Dr. Samuel T. Whatley; Samuel T. Whatley, Ii v. Oakbrook Health and Rehabilitation Center

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1006
PACITA D. WHATLEY; REVEREND DR. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY; SAMUEL
T. WHATLEY, II,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
OAKBROOK HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Sherri A. Lydon, District Judge. (2:23-cv-02274-SAL)
Submitted: March 12, 2024 Decided: March 15, 2024
Before GREGORY, RICHARDSON, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pacita D. Whatley, Samuel T. Whatley, Samuel T. Whatley, II, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Pacita D. Whatley, Reverend Dr. Samuel T. Whatley, and Samuel T. Whatley II,
appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice∗ the Whatleys’ action alleging violations of the False Claims
Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 to 3733. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Whatley v. Oakbrook Health &
Rehab. Ctr., No. 2:23-cv-02274-SAL (D.S.C. Dec. 13, 2023). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ The district court’s dismissal without prejudice is a final order because the court
dismissed the complaint “without granting leave to amend.” Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790,
791 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (order).

-- 2 of 2 --