Dewayne K. Handy, Jr.; Sonya McIntyre-Handy v. York County Sheriff’s Department; York County Court; (scicac) Attorney General

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6676
DEWAYNE K. HANDY, JR.; SONYA MCINTYRE-HANDY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
YORK COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; YORK COUNTY COURT;
(SCICAC) ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Sherri A. Lydon, District Judge. (0:23-cv-05363-SAL)
Submitted: January 23, 2025 Decided: January 28, 2025
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
DeWayne K. Handy, Jr.; Sonya McIntyre-Handy, Appellants Pro Se. Daniel C. Plyler,
SMITH ROBINSON HOLLER DUBOSE & MORGAN, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
DeWayne K. Handy, Jr., and Sonya McIntyre-Handy appeal the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on their 42
U.S.C. § 1983 amended complaint, in which they raised several constitutional violations
centered around DeWayne Handy’s May 2023 arrest. The Handys also appeal the district
court’s denial of numerous postjudgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error in the district court’s determination that Defendants were entitled to
Eleventh Amendment immunity, nor do we discern any abuse of discretion in the denial of
Appellants’ postjudgment motions. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders.
Handy v. York Cnty. Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. 0:23-cv-05363-SAL (D.S.C. May 9, 2024; May
14, 2024; July 11, 2024; Sept. 26, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --