Kaprina Glenn v. Foothills Property Management, LLC

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1091
KAPRINA GLENN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
FOOTHILLS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. William Stevens Brown, V, Magistrate Judge. (8:24-cv-07694-JDA)
Submitted: July 24, 2025 Decided: July 28, 2025
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kaprina Glenn, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kaprina Glenn filed this action in the district court, seeking to remove an eviction
proceeding filed against her by her landlord in state court to a federal court. Glenn seeks
to appeal the report and recommendation filed by the magistrate judge recommending
remanding the action to the state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This court
may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Glenn seeks to appeal is neither a
final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Haney v. Addison, 175 F.3d
1217, 1219 (10th Cir. 1999) (“Absent both designation by the district court and consent of
the parties, a magistrate[ judge]’s recommendation is not a final appealable decision . . . .”).
Accordingly, we dismiss Glenn’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --