Ronald Satish Emrit, d/b/a United Emrits of America, Presidential Candidate Number… v. SENATOR JOHN THUNE, R-North Dakota

25-2214Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28 gen 2026

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-2214
RONALD SATISH EMRIT, d/b/a United Emrits of America, Presidential
Candidate Number P60005535, Presidential Committee/Political Action
Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SENATOR JOHN THUNE, R-North Dakota; SENATOR SUSAN COLLINS, R-
Maine; SENATOR JONI ERNNST, R-Iowa; SENATOR LISA MURKOWSKI, R-
Alaska; CONGRESSWOMAN MARJORIE TAYLOR GREENE, R-Georgia,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Adam B. Abelson, District Judge. (8:25-cv-02623-ABA)
Submitted: January 22, 2026 Decided: January 28, 2026
Before AGEE, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Satish Emrit filed a notice of appeal in his civil case two months after filing
his complaint and before the district court had entered any orders. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Emrit does not seek to appeal either a final order or
an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.