James R. Watson, Jr. v. Meta Platforms Technologies, LLC; C.s.c. Global

25-2385Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit30 mar 2026

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-2385
JAMES R. WATSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
META PLATFORMS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; C.S.C. GLOBAL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Sherri A. Lydon, District Judge. (4:25-cv-08217-SAL)
Submitted: March 26, 2026 Decided: March 30, 2026
Before RICHARDSON and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James R. Watson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
James R. Watson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders (1) accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Watson’s pro se
civil complaint, and (2) denying Watson’s motion for reconsideration.* We have reviewed
the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
orders. Watson v. Meta Platforms Techs., LLC, No. 4:25-cv-08217-SAL (D.S.C., Sep. 23,
2025; Nov. 12, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The district court’s dismissal order is a final decision because the court dismissed
the complaint “without providing leave to amend.” Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 796 (4th
Cir. 2022) (en banc).

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.