William Hercules Davis, Jr. v. Wayne Goodwin

25-2394Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit3 mar 2026

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-2394
WILLIAM HERCULES DAVIS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAYNE GOODWIN; K. SHOTWELL; CHIEF OF POLICE TAYLOR;
CHRISTOPHER DUNNAGAN; TROOPER D. ENNIS; JUDGE WALTER
MILLS; PAUL KRINCHAL; EVERNS KISTLER; CRYSTAL BECK;
MICHAEL D. BROADWELL; B. ZMUDA; ERIC JONES; BRYAN DIXON;
BRINKLY; JUDGE ANDREW WIGMORE; CLERKS; DEPUTY CLERKS;
ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEYS; UNKNOWN OTHERS, 1 – 100,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Greenville. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (4:24-cv-00161-M-RJ)
Submitted: February 26, 2026 Decided: March 2, 2026
Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Hercules Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
William Hercules Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Davis’s civil complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. Davis v. Goodwin, No. 4:24-cv-00161-M-RJ (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2025). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.