United States of America v. Victor Bernard Perkins

25-6136Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28 mag 2025

Testo completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6136
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner - Appellee,
v.
VICTOR BERNARD PERKINS,
Respondent - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:92-hc-00654-FL)
Submitted: May 22, 2025 Decided: May 28, 2025
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor Bernard Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Genna Danelle Petre, Special Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Victor Bernard Perkins appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se motion
for a procedural order, finding that Perkins must file any motions through his appointed
counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s order. United States v. Perkins, No. 5:92-hc-00654-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan.
8, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.