Marcus Antonio Satterfield v. Officer Schuster

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6460
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER SCHUSTER; MICHAEL T. HAWKINS; JONNY SPEARMAN;
JACOBS RAEFORD; PATRICIA A. ALSTON; SGT. MCCALLISTER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:25-ct-03080-D)
Submitted: September 18, 2025 Decided: September 23, 2025
Before THACKER and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcus Antonio Satterfield, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Marcus Antonio Satterfield appeals the district court’s order dismissing without
prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b).* We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s determination that
Satterfield failed to plausibly allege a violation of his constitutional rights and its decision
to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any remaining state law claims.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Satterfield v. Schuster, No. 5:25-ct-
03080-D (E.D.N.C. May 27, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The district court’s order is final and appealable because the court did not grant
leave to amend. Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 796 (4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (order).

-- 2 of 2 --