Testo completo
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-10696
Conference Calendar
DARRYL WALLACE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
THOMAS WINDHAM, Fort Worth Chief of Police;
DAVID WILLIAMS, Tarrant County Sheriff,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:99-CV-585-Y
--------------------
October 18, 2000
Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Darryl Wallace (TDCJ # 636243) appeals the district court’s
dismissal of his pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP) civil rights
complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Wallace
does not, however, refer to the district court’s judgment, and he
does not allege any error that the district court made in
disposing of his complaint.
An appellant’s brief must contain an argument on the issues
that are raised so that this court may know what action of the
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 00-10696
-2-
district court is being complained of. Al-Ra’id v. Ingle, 69
F.3d 28, 31 (5th Cir. 1995). There is no exemption for pro se
litigants, though we construe their briefs liberally. Id.
Because Wallace has neither briefed nor identified any error in
the dismissal of his complaint, the judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
