Testo completo
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
February 14, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-40752
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RONNIE LEE HAMPTON, also known as Rabbit,
also known as Robert Hampton,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:03-CR-62-ALL-LED
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Ronnie Lee Hampton has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hampton has not filed
a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The Government’s motion to
dismiss the appeal is DENIED as moot.
-- 1 of 1 --
