Testo completo
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-11237
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ADAM SCHMIDT,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:05-CR-89-ALL
--------------------
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Adam
Schmidt has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Schmidt has not responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent
review of the record and counsel’s brief shows that there are no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
