Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Raymundo Sandoval

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion
should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-10055
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
RAYMUNDO SANDOVAL
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:99-CR-73-ALL
Before KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Raymundo Sandoval appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed
following the revocation of his term of supervised release, arguing that his
sentence was unreasonable under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).
The district court properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors when
imposing Sandoval’s sentence. See United States v. Gonzalez, 250 F.3d 923, 930
(5th Cir. 2001). Sandoval’s sentence, which was the statutory maximum, was
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
November 7, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 07-10055
2
neither unreasonable nor plainly unreasonable. See United States v. Hinson,
429 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 2005).
Sandoval also argues that the district court violated the Sixth Amendment
when it revoked his release and imposed an additional prison term based on
facts found only by a preponderance of the evidence. Sandoval acknowledges
that this argument is foreclosed by Hinson, 429 F.3d at 119, but raises it to
preserve it for further review.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --